Prognostic significance of serum galectin-3 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There are no major tools that could predict disease severity in COVID-19. The aim of this study is to evaluate if serum galectin-3 levels can identify disease progression in COVID-19. METHODS: Patients that were hospitalized due to COVID-19 between March and June 2020 were included in this cross-sectional prospective study. Baseline demographic and clinical data in addition to levels of serum parameters including galectin-3 were measured at the time of hospital admission. Patients with COVID-19 were categorized into two groups (non-severe and severe illness). The need for ICU during hospital stay, duration from hospital admission to the transfer to the ICU, and the total length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were included in the study and among these, 64 patients formed the severe illness group whereas 111 comprised the non-severe illness group. There was statistically significant difference in terms of galectin-3 levels between groups (1.07 ± 0.75 vs 0.484 ± 0.317, p < 0.0001, respectively). Our results showed that galectin-3, IL-6 and CRP levels at admission were independent risk factors associated with transfer to the ICU whereas only galectin-3 was an independent factor for the need for advanced ventilatory support. Also, galectin-3 and IL-6 were independent risk factors related to in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results indicated that galectin-3 had moderate power in outlining disease severity and the need for ICU transfer throughout the clinical course in COVID-19.

Prognostic value of GRACE risk score in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 pandemic continues to threaten human health as novel mutant variants emerge and disease severity ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. Thus, studies are needed to identify the patients with ICU need as well as those who have subsequent mortality. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is a validated score in acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate if GRACE score can indicate adverse outcomes and major ischemic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: All hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 at our institution between March 2020 and September 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were grouped according to GRACE risk scores: low risk 0-108 points, intermediate risk 109-140 and high risk ≥141. RESULTS: A total of 787 patients were enrolled; 434 patients formed group 1. One-hundred forty-one patients in group 2 and 212 patients formed group 3. We found that inhospital mortality, length of hospital stay, ICU and advanced ventilatory support need were associated with increasing GRACE risk score. In addition, major ischemic events were more frequently observed in higher risk groups and strong positive correlations between GRACE risk score and pro-BNP, procalcitonin and moderate positive correlation with D-dimer, CRP, NLR was found. Regression analysis showed that only GRACE risk score was an independent risk factor associated with inhospital mortality, major ischemic events, advanced ventilatory support and ICU need. CONCLUSION: The GRACE risk score is easy to apply on hospital admission and useful for classifying those in medium-high-intensity care units and to raise the assignments of sources.

Long-Term Clinical Consequences of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019, putatively caused by infection with severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2, often involves injury to multiple organs and there are limited data regarding the mid- to long-term consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 after discharge from the hospital. The study aimed to describe the mid- to long-term consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized patients after discharge. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled coronavirus disease 2019 patients who were discharged uneventfully from our center. All participants underwent face-toface interviews by trained physicians and were asked to complete a series of questionnaires on third and sixth months' follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 406 consecutive discharged coronavirus disease 2019 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to World Health Organization classification as follows: World Health Organization-3 (n=83); World Health Organization-4 (n=291); and World Health Organization-5,6 (n=32). Length of hospital stay was highly, significantly increased in the higher World Health Organization groups (World Health Organization-3 vs. World Health Organization-4, P < .0001; World Health Organization-3 vs. World Health Organization-5,6, P < .0001; World Health Organization-4 vs. World Health Organization-5,6, P < .0001), whereas the length of intensive care unit stay was highly, significantly increased only in World Health Organization-5,6 group compared to other groups (World Health Organization-3 vs. World Health Organization-5,6, P < .0001; World Health Organization-4 vs. World Health Organization-5,6, P < .0001). The most frequent complaints were chest pain (39%), and the frequency of complaints decreased during the 3-6 months follow-up period. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age, coronary artery disease, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, troponin I, D-dimer, use of steroid and/or low molecular weight heparin, and World Health Organization class were found to be independent predictors of ongoing cardiovascular symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The current data demonstrated that persistent symptoms were common after coronavirus disease 2019 among hospitalized patients. This should raise awareness among healthcare professionals regarding coronavirus disease 2019 aftercare.